The Enslaved Dataset: A Real-world Complex Ontology Alignment Benchmark using Wikibase (Q22): Difference between revisions

From Research Literature for Wikibase
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(‎Created a new Item: #quickstatements; #temporary_batch_1695804352709)
 
(‎Changed claim: Link to Text (P5): https://dl.acm.org/doi/pdf/10.1145/3340531.3412768)
 
(7 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Property / Author(s)
 
Lu Zhou, Cogan Shimizu, Pascal Hitzler, Alicia M. Sheill, Seila Gonzalez Estrecha, Catherine Foley, Duncan Tarr, Dean Rehberger (English)
Property / Author(s): Lu Zhou, Cogan Shimizu, Pascal Hitzler, Alicia M. Sheill, Seila Gonzalez Estrecha, Catherine Foley, Duncan Tarr, Dean Rehberger (English) / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / Link to Text
 
Property / Link to Text: https://dl.acm.org/doi/pdf/10.1145/3340531.3412768 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / Publication Year
 
2020
Timestamp+2020-00-00T00:00:00Z
Timezone+00:00
CalendarGregorian
Precision1 year
Before0
After0
Property / Publication Year: 2020 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / Publication type
 
Property / Publication type: Book Chapter / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / Publication title
 
The Enslaved Dataset: A Real-world Complex Ontology Alignment Benchmark using Wikibase (English)
Property / Publication title: The Enslaved Dataset: A Real-world Complex Ontology Alignment Benchmark using Wikibase (English) / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / Abstract
 
Ontology alignment has taken a critical place for helping heterogeneous resources to interoperate. It has been studied for over a decade, and over that time many alignment systems and methods have been developed by researchers to find simple 1:1 equivalence matches between two ontologies. However, very few alignment systems focus on finding complex correspondences. Even if the complex alignment systems are developed, the performance of finding complex relations still has a lot of room for improvement. One reason for this limitation may be that there are still few applicable alignment benchmarks that contain such complex relationships that can raise researchers' interests. In this paper, we propose a real-world dataset from the Enslaved project as a potential complex alignment benchmark. The benchmark consists of two resources, the Enslaved Ontology along with a Wikibase repository holding a large number of instance data from the Enslaved project, as well as a manually created reference alignment between them. The alignment was developed in consultation with domain experts in the digital humanities. The alignment not only includes simple 1:1 equivalence correspondences, but also more complex m:n equivalence and subsumption correspondences and are provided in both Expressive and Declarative Ontology Alignment Language (EDOAL) format and rule syntax. The Enslaved benchmark has been incorporated into the Ontology Alignment Evaluation Initiative (OAEI) 2020 and is completely free for public use to assist the researchers in developing and evaluating their complex alignment algorithms. (English)
Property / Abstract: Ontology alignment has taken a critical place for helping heterogeneous resources to interoperate. It has been studied for over a decade, and over that time many alignment systems and methods have been developed by researchers to find simple 1:1 equivalence matches between two ontologies. However, very few alignment systems focus on finding complex correspondences. Even if the complex alignment systems are developed, the performance of finding complex relations still has a lot of room for improvement. One reason for this limitation may be that there are still few applicable alignment benchmarks that contain such complex relationships that can raise researchers' interests. In this paper, we propose a real-world dataset from the Enslaved project as a potential complex alignment benchmark. The benchmark consists of two resources, the Enslaved Ontology along with a Wikibase repository holding a large number of instance data from the Enslaved project, as well as a manually created reference alignment between them. The alignment was developed in consultation with domain experts in the digital humanities. The alignment not only includes simple 1:1 equivalence correspondences, but also more complex m:n equivalence and subsumption correspondences and are provided in both Expressive and Declarative Ontology Alignment Language (EDOAL) format and rule syntax. The Enslaved benchmark has been incorporated into the Ontology Alignment Evaluation Initiative (OAEI) 2020 and is completely free for public use to assist the researchers in developing and evaluating their complex alignment algorithms. (English) / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / Item type
 
Property / Item type: RPX / rank
 
Normal rank

Latest revision as of 08:56, 28 September 2023

Zhou et al 2020
Language Label Description Also known as
English
The Enslaved Dataset: A Real-world Complex Ontology Alignment Benchmark using Wikibase
Zhou et al 2020

    Statements

    Lu Zhou, Cogan Shimizu, Pascal Hitzler, Alicia M. Sheill, Seila Gonzalez Estrecha, Catherine Foley, Duncan Tarr, Dean Rehberger (English)
    0 references
    2020
    0 references
    The Enslaved Dataset: A Real-world Complex Ontology Alignment Benchmark using Wikibase (English)
    0 references
    Ontology alignment has taken a critical place for helping heterogeneous resources to interoperate. It has been studied for over a decade, and over that time many alignment systems and methods have been developed by researchers to find simple 1:1 equivalence matches between two ontologies. However, very few alignment systems focus on finding complex correspondences. Even if the complex alignment systems are developed, the performance of finding complex relations still has a lot of room for improvement. One reason for this limitation may be that there are still few applicable alignment benchmarks that contain such complex relationships that can raise researchers' interests. In this paper, we propose a real-world dataset from the Enslaved project as a potential complex alignment benchmark. The benchmark consists of two resources, the Enslaved Ontology along with a Wikibase repository holding a large number of instance data from the Enslaved project, as well as a manually created reference alignment between them. The alignment was developed in consultation with domain experts in the digital humanities. The alignment not only includes simple 1:1 equivalence correspondences, but also more complex m:n equivalence and subsumption correspondences and are provided in both Expressive and Declarative Ontology Alignment Language (EDOAL) format and rule syntax. The Enslaved benchmark has been incorporated into the Ontology Alignment Evaluation Initiative (OAEI) 2020 and is completely free for public use to assist the researchers in developing and evaluating their complex alignment algorithms. (English)
    0 references
    0 references